
Podcast: Play in new window | Download
Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | Amazon Music | Android | Pandora | iHeartRadio | JioSaavn | Podchaser | Gaana | Podcast Index | TuneIn | Deezer | RSS
Now it’s Gordon Stein’s turn to assess the debate so far. With Stein’s assessment he believes that Bahnsen hasn’t offered anything other than feelings based arguments and non sequiturs. He doesn’t feel the need to offer an explanation for why the universe exists and he sees laws of science, logic, and math only as agreed upon by consensus items. Why? What’s wrong with that?
00:00 – Introduction
02:34 – Does The Universe Require A Cause?
03:56 – Looking For How God Created
05:43 – God Is Very Knowable
08:04 – Scientific & Logic Laws Are Just Consensus According To Atheist
11:25 – Philosophical Death Is The Result
12:33 – Math Is Also Consensus
15:27 – An Atheist Universe Has Regularity Because Of Internal Properties
16:56 – The Cause Of The Universe Must Be A Part Of It Says Atheist
20:56 – Do Atheists Destroy All History Or Are Christians Only Feelings-Based?
25:35 – Stein Finally Deals With The Transcendental Argument
31:04 – Conclusion


The Great Debate – Does God Exist? – Edited and Commentary by Joshua Pillows
Debate Transcript Video
The Bahnsen Institute
All episodes, short clips, & blog – https://www.cavetothecross.com