
Podcast: Play in new window | Download
Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | Amazon Music | Android | Pandora | iHeartRadio | JioSaavn | Podchaser | Gaana | Podcast Index | TuneIn | Deezer | RSS
Where Stein has claimed that the laws of logic are only agreed upon but useful, Bahnsen is having a hard time accepting that – because it’s wrong. It’s up to Bahnsen to try and make the case for the atheist metaphysical use of the laws of logic. But it’s also up to Bahnsen to shoot those down too and show the failure of atheistic logic.
00:00 – Introduction
01:57 – A Battle Of Worldviews
05:46 – The Atheist Doesn’t Have Reason To Use Reason
07:10 – The Christian’s Reason For Reason
08:08 – The Laws Of Logic Need A Mind
08:28 – Helpful Remind Of The Laws Of Logic
10:06 – Justifying Truth Of Logic Without Needing To Test It
11:42 – Not Proven Because They’re Used
13:40 – Logic Is More Conceptual Than Empirical
14:31 – Why Logic Can Always Be Used Consistently If They’re Only Agreed Upon
17:12 – If Logic Relies On People Only Why Don’t We Have Different Scholarships
18:49 – To The Library!
21:06 – Conclusion


The Great Debate – Does God Exist? – Edited and Commentary by Joshua Pillows
Debate Transcript Video
The Bahnsen Institute
All episodes, short clips, & blog – https://www.cavetothecross.com