Podcast: Play in new window | Download
Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | Amazon Music | Android | Pandora | iHeartRadio | JioSaavn | Podchaser | Gaana | Podcast Index | TuneIn | Deezer | RSS
The goal is not to reject science. It’s understanding the failure that scientism provides when it comes to understanding. However, adopting a philosophy first framework provides the foundation for science to function (and the presuppositions needed for the necessary preconditions of intelligibility). So he’s the case for adopting First Philosophy.
00:00 – Introduction
01:44 – Recovering Philosophy First In Knowledge
03:07 – Two Benefits Of 1st Philosophy
03:45 – The War Against 1st Philosophy
05:07 – The Two Theses Of 1st Philosophy
06:30 – The Negative Outcomes Of Rejecting 1st Philosophy
07:35 – The Purpose Of Philosophy According To Scientism
09:48 – Why They Reject 1st Philosophy – Starting Assumptions
11:09 – Why They Reject 1st Philosophy – Disagreement Among Philosophy
12:40 – Why They Reject 1st Philosophy – Cartesian Certainty
13:35 – Foundationalism Vs. Cartesian Certainty
17:53 – Cartesian Certainty Impossibility
22:20 – Conclusion
Scientism and Secularism – Learning to Respond to a Dangerous Ideology by J.P. Moreland
Kindle
Paperback
Audible (FREE With Membership)
Logos
J.P. Moreland Website
All episodes, short clips, & blog – https://www.cavetothecross.com