
Podcast: Play in new window | Download
Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | Amazon Music | Android | Pandora | iHeartRadio | JioSaavn | Podchaser | Gaana | Podcast Index | TuneIn | Deezer | RSS
We’re breaking up Bahnsen’s 2nd rebuttal into two sections as we did with Stein, as there are two major sections both have covered. In this first half, Bahnsen makes the case of the use of blind faith of atheist materialism, in which the worldview has no ability to justify the use of logic or of science, as the issues that have been covered in the debate – that of the problem of induction and the non-material nature of logic leads to a denial that they even exist.
00:00 – Introduction
01:26 – Bahnsen Hasn’t Heard Any Justification For An Atheist To The Laws Of Logic
03:35 – The Issue Of Induction To Science Has Gone Unanswered
05:23 – The Future Is Only Probability For Atheists
07:35 – The Atheist’s Blind Faith In Logic & Science
10:55 – Conclusion


The Great Debate – Does God Exist? – Edited and Commentary by Joshua Pillows
Debate Transcript Video
The Bahnsen Institute
All episodes, short clips, & blog – https://www.cavetothecross.com